|
Most Asked Questions
About TMDLs.
The TMDL program was initiated
to restore surface water sources like streams and lakes to their
greatest potential beneficial use. These uses, defined for each water
body by the state in which it lies, may include drinking water, fishing,
swimming and other recreational activities, irrigation, and aesthetics.
TMDLs are also designed to protect further degradation of surface water
sources.
TMDLs are particularly
important for controlling nonpoint sources, because past regulations
focused on point sources only.
2. In setting TMDLs, how does one perform
a watershed TMDL analysis that integrates
both point and nonpoint source
loads?
Past pollution controls have
emphasized point sources. However, there is now increased recognition of
the impacts of nonpoint sources as human activities intensify on the
landscape. The quality of water in a stream, lake, or estuary is the
result of all the pollutants entering the system.
So both types of sources have
to be integrated in evaluating the impacts on water quality. That
integration becomes very complex because of the need to reconcile
measurements of load and concentration (Load = Concentration x Flow).
In many ways it makes sense to
treat the point sources as part of a constant baseline, like
back-ground, natural inputs. The objective with management of point
sources, of course, is to lower that baseline value.
Nonpoint sources should be
considered both in terms of loads and in terms of flow. Flow is valuable
in streams, as long as it isn’t excessive. Aquatic life depends on the
flow inputs. (It’s been said, half jokingly in some cases, that one
effective way to lower loads is to eliminate flow.
This is true. It also
eliminates the potential for aquatic life in that part of the system.)
The flow associated with high
runoff periods, then, needs to be integrated into the baseline
(groundwater plus point sources) flow in some rational way to produce a
desired condition.
It is important to remind
yourself when working on TMDLs that the essential key to success is
improved water quality and beneficial uses, not strictly meeting load
allocations, which may be difficult to manage and predict. This
information can be summarized as follows:
- For high concentration,
low flow point sources, focus on methods that lower both
concentration and volume of flow. Lowering either will improve water
quality. For example, in industry with high-biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)
effluent, irrigating with wastewater during the summer may be good use,
eliminating both concentration and flow altogether.
- For high concentration,
high flow point sources such as a wastewater treatment plant
emptying into small stream, focus on lowering concentration while
maintaining flow.
- For typically low
concentration, nonpoint sources: focus on lowering concentrations
and possibly evening out flow, which creates less runoff and greater
groundwater recharge for later slow release to the stream. An example:
increasing infiltration into urban stormwater treatment systems that
also filter out pollutants.
When BMPs are implemented that
address these targets in each source type, the overall health of the
receiving water will improve.
3. How does one calculate the watershed
TMDL for a stream in which flow varies
significantly?
Stream flow rates can vary
tremendously based on seasonal rainfall, snowmelt, stored water
releases, and removal from the stream by irrigators and other users. A
TMDL established for a pollutant at the 95 th percentile flow could be
unrealistically large. Instead, consider the season of concern – is
the pollutant a problem in high-flow, high-runoff periods, or during
low-flow seasons – and base your TMDL on an average flow rate for that
season. In some cases, seasonal minimum or maximum flow rates have been
used. (For more detail on flow, see "Flow Measurements to Determine
Loads")
4. How does one calculate a TMDL for a
lake?
Set loads for the lake, then
assign portions of that load to the point sources, tributaries,
groundwater, and sediments, based on what you think can be their minimal
contributions. Remember that in some cases, groundwater and sediments
may provide more than enough nutrient to keep the lake eutrophic
(nutrient-rich).
5. How do we know if the TMDL
program has succeeded?
Careful, frequent, and accurate
monitoring and data analysis tell us when the TMDLs are working.
Tracking trends over time –
while taking into account weather differences and other year-to-year
variables – provides the information necessary to determine whether or
not the ecosystem is actually improving in quality.
Effects of the cleanup of large
point sources can be rapidly detected in the receiving waters.
When the wastewater treatment
plants along the Tualatin River enhanced their tertiary treatment and
began releasing water containing 50 ppb total P instead of 7,000 ppb
water during the summer, average river total P concentrations decreased
from nearly 1,000 ppb to about 150 ppb within weeks.
In contrast, nonpoint source
cleanup, achieved for the most part by BMPs, can be much harder to
detect. Watersheds are large and respond slowly to management changes,
so changes in water quality can take a long time. US EPA is encouraging
an emphasis on small watersheds and projects in watershed headwaters,
where the impacts of BMPs can be more significant and measurable. EPA
and NRCS are preparing a document that discusses the relative
sensitivity of water bodies to changes in the inputs of P and N (NRCS/USEPA,
in press: "A Procedure To Estimate The Response Of Aquatic Systems
To Changes In Phosphorus And Nitrogen Inputs").
The more careful the
monitoring, the greater the likelihood of detecting changes early.
Weather at the time of sampling must be taken into account; continuous
monitoring data are most helpful here, since big events are not missed.
Poor data collection, management, and interpretation can almost
eliminate the potential for detecting improvements except in highly
polluted, highly responsive systems.
The ultimate test of success is
not simply improvements in water quality parameters, but in the uses
that can be made of the water body. At various times, biological surveys
should be taken to determine whether or not desirable biological
activity is being enhanced. The ability of the aquatic ecosystem to
support swimming, fishing, boating, drinking water and irrigation water
uses should be evaluated by direct measurements as often as is possible
through the course of the TMDL program.
© 1999, YSI Incorporated
|