What's Core 4 Conservation?

Core 4 Conservation Partners

News

Core 4 Conservation Brochures

Conservation Tillage

Nutrient Management

Weed & Pest Management (IPM)

Conservation Buffers

Ag Events Calendar

CTIC Partners Newsletter

Catalog

Resource Links

Ag-Earth Partners

MAX

Contact Us/Staff

2000 Crop Residue Management Survey
News Release - Southeast Version

NEWS RELEASE __________________________________________

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                 CONTACT:  Dan Towery
November 3 , 2000                                                          (765) 494-6952

No-till on the upswing
Results of tillage system usage survey released

WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind.  More farmers are just saying “no” to tillage. A survey of tillage system usage in the U.S. released today reports that since 1990, the number of U.S. cropland acres planted without tillage has increased more than 200 percent to 51 million acres today.  Southeast states planted 39% of the corn, 20% of the cotton, and 58% of the soybeans using no-till systems, which plant seeds into a cover crop or the stem, stalk and leaf residue of a previous crop without using tillage.

The 2000 Crop Residue Management Survey, released today by the Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC), collects information from each county in the U.S. to assess tillage system usage by crop. “These survey results verify that more farmers are discovering the benefits of no-till, especially in cotton and soybeans,” says Bruno Alesii, chair of CTIC, a public/private partnership in West Lafayette, Ind. In addition, these conservation tillage farmers are increasing their soil organic matter and sequestering carbon which is part of the Core 4 Conservation strategy of a systems approach for “better soils, cleaner water, greater profits and a brighter future.”

By leaving last year’s crop residue on a field, farmers using no-till/strip-till systems make fewer tractor trips, use less fuel, reduce soil loss, improve soil quality and water quality of nearby streams and lakes. This year’s survey shows that no-till and other conservation tillage systems make sound economic and environmental sense  to farmers, according to Dave Schertz, national agronomist with U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service.

“Conservation tillage is a cornerstone of a producers farming operation,” Schertz says. “By eliminating or significantly reducing tillage trips, planting cover crops and leaving residue on the soil surface, farmers are using a more environmentally friendly production system that reduces input costs and improves profitability.  They are also reducing soil erosion, improving soil structure, and increasing the organic matter content or carbon content of their soils.”

Tennessee and Kentucky both planted 55% of the corn acres no-till. Cotton in the Southeast jumped from 12.6% of the acres planted no-till in 1998 to 19.9% this year. Tennessee planted 45% of the cotton acres no-till. Improvements in weed control options including GMO cotton contributed to this increase.  49% of all crops in Kentucky were planted no-till.  Georgia planted almost 7% of the state’s peanuts no-till/strip-till.  A few years ago it was thought that it was impossible to grow peanuts without multiple tillage operations.  In Alabama no-till cotton increased from 18.5% in 1998 to 34.7% this year. 

Alesii attributes the upward trend in no-till to the efforts of partnership groups working to increase adoption of conservation tillage practices in the Southeast. “ The increase in no-till acres in these states is very gratifying,” he says. “The public/private partnership working together with farmers can transfer site-specific solutions such as strip-till. I expect to see a substantial increase in no-till acres in future years.”

No-till usage nationwide has increased nearly 7 percent in the last two years to the current level of 17.6 percent of 290 million acres of annually planted cropland. Other conservation tillage system usage numbers: 18 percent of acres use mulch-till (full-width tillage that leaves more than 30 percent residue) and 1.2 percent use ridge-till (planting on ridges formed during cultivation the previous year). Conservation tillage usage was 36.8 percent nationally this year, a slight decrease since 1998. This decrease was a result in significantly less mulch-till acres and was primarily due to an improved residue measuring procedure utilized by USDA/Natural Resources Conservation Service personnel and other conservation partners, according to the survey report.

 For more information about the 2000 Crop Residue Management Survey or Core 4 Conservation, please contact Dan Towery, natural resources specialist with Conservation Technology Information Center, at 765-494-6952 or e-mail towery@ctic.purdue.edu .   Website : www.core4.org

                                               ###