Perennial weed control
Perennial weeds increase primarily in continuous no-till systems. Their control
can be difficult for two reasons, especially if conventional techniques are used:
Herbicides to control perennials
may be
applied at the wrong
time, and
Many perennials have extensive
underground
root systems and
vegetative structures, which
allow them to produce new
growth even
after their tops have
been cut or burned
off by
chemicals.
Often, several other techniques may be required for successful control, such as:
Using wipe-on applicators to
apply
nonselective, translocated
herbicides to
weeds taller than
the crop.
Spot treating to control or
suppress
perennials prior to
planting, in the crop,
or before
harvest.
Spraying perennial weeds in
fence rows, field
borders, and
other non-crop areas.
Hand-removing simple perennial
weeds (like
pokeweed and curly
dock) and any
volunteer trees. A
large portion of the root
or crown
must be removed.
Reduced rates
When it comes to herbicides, no-till is usually considered a high-input system
because it often relies on more than one herbicide. The primary difference in
herbicide use between no-till and conventional tillage is the use of burndown
herbicides, which can amount to an additional $8-$12 per acre. (Burndowns
don't tax the environment because they are designed to be active only in the weed
and neutralize upon contact with the soil.)
While it is sometimes possible to eliminate a bumdown treatment, this is
more the exception to the rule. Proper use of adjuvants and surfactants as well as
timing is critical. It may take several tries to finally be successful.
More and more producers are experimenting with reduced rates (rates below
those on the herbicide label). This strategy can be effective, if weed pressures are low
at or near the time of planting. Although reducing rates can cut herbicide costs,
there is substantial risk involved. Should you have a failure in weed |
control, the chemical company will probably not support any complaints, since the labeled
rates are based on extensive research trials.
Successful weed control with reduced rates is dependent on at least three factors:
Scouting - You must know the type of weed, size and growth stage, and overall
weed pressure. Reduced rates work best in fields with low weed pressure.

New global positioning system (GPS) backpacks allow farmers to scout fields and
mark locations of pests on a hand held computer. The information could then be fed
into a computer guidance system on sprayers to spot-apply herbicides.
Crop competition - Narrow-row crop production helps shade out emerging
weeds. Wide-row systems make success with reduced rates more difficult. With
wide rows, you may need to rely on row crop cultivation to alleviate
weed pressure in the form of escapes and uncontrolled weeds.
Herbicide efficacy - Many herbicides lose effectiveness on certain
weeds at reduced rates, so know the product and its capabilities before
trying reduced rates. It's usually a good idea to check with your chemical
company representative before applying reduced rates.
You may have noticed that using reduced rates is contrary to the seven-point weed
management plan outlined on page 16. Let's try to make this the only allowable
exception.
Note: Crops bioengineered for herbicide tolerance can be valuable when managing
difficult weed populations. They should not be used in fields every year, but rather
in rotation with other weed control strategies.
|